Merck Clinical Trials Logo Merck Clinical Trials

Clinical Trial Finder

Merck Clinical Trial Finder
  • About clinical trials
    • About Clinical Trials
    • How does participation work?
    • What to consider
    • Frequently asked questions
  • Resources
    • Resources
    • For patients
    • For caregivers
  • Our medical science
  • For HCPs
  • English
    • Back
    • English
    • Español

Condition: Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer

The purpose of this study is to assess the antitumor efficacy and safety of perioperative enfortumab vedotin (EV) plus pembrolizumab and radical cystectomy (RC) + pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) compared with the current standard of care (neoadjuvant chemotherapy [gemcitabine plus cisplatin] and RC + PLND) for participants with MIBC who are cisplatin-eligible. The dual primary hypotheses are preoperative EV + pembrolizumab and RC + PLND (Arm A) will achieve superior pathologic complete response (pCR) rate and perioperative EV and pembrolizumab and RC + PLND (Arm A) will achieve superior event free survival (EFS) compared with neoadjuvant gemcitabine + cisplatin and RC + PLND (Arm B).

Perioperative Enfortumab Vedotin Plus Pembrolizumab Versus Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Cisplatin-eligible Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer

October 6, 2022

By clique_admin

The purpose of this study is to assess the antitumor efficacy and safety of perioperative enfortumab vedotin (EV) plus pembrolizumab and radical cystectomy (RC) + pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) compared

Merck Clinical Trials Logo Merck Clinical Trials
  • Merck.com
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Policies & Perspectives
  • Cookie Preferences
  • Accessibility

Copyright © 2023 Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA and its affiliates. All rights reserved.

THIS WEBSITE IS INTENDED FOR A UNITED STATES AUDIENCE ONLY

Merck Essential Accessibility

Merck Essential Accessibility