Skip to Content
Merck Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trials

  • English
  • Español
Merck

Clinical Trials

Merck Clinical Trials Primary

  • About clinical trials
    • How does participation work?
    • What to consider
    • Frequently asked questions
  • Resources
    • For patients
    • For caregivers
  • Our medical science
  • For HCPs

Study Keyword: Thrombocythemia, Essential

This is a study evaluating the safety and efficacy of bomedemstat (MK-3543) compared with the best available treatment (BAT) in participants with essential thrombocythemia (ET) who have an inadequate response to or are intolerant of hydroxyurea.

The primary study hypothesis is that bomedemstat is superior to the best available treatment with respect to durable clinicohematologic response (DCHR).

A Study of Bomedemstat Compared to Best Available Therapy in Participants With Essential Thrombocythemia and an Inadequate Response or Intolerance of Hydroxyurea

November 13, 2023

By Harrison

This is a study evaluating the safety and efficacy of bomedemstat (MK-3543) compared with the best available treatment (BAT) in participants with essential thrombocythemia (ET) who have an inadequate response to

Merck Clinical Trials Logo Merck Clinical Trials
  • Merck.com
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Policies & Perspectives
  • Cookie Preferences
  • Accessibility

Copyright © 2023 Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA and its affiliates. All rights reserved.

THIS WEBSITE IS INTENDED FOR A UNITED STATES AUDIENCE ONLY

Merck Essential Accessibility

Icon for accessibility